www.PhoenixTalks.com
                    

DEC cites farm for manure runoff

The Owasco Lake Watershed inspector said the foam shown in this photo indicates that manure from a nearby Twin Birch Dairy farm field was washed into Dutch Hollow Brook tributary during last week’s heavy rain. The photo was taken by the watershed inspector as part of an ongoing investigation into the run-off pollution that entered both the Skaneateles and Owasco lake watersheds.
A local diary farm was charged with violating state water quality standards after last week’s heavy rains allegedly washed manure off a field and into a tributary feeding the Owasco and Skaneateles lake watersheds.
Bion is not going away  
 
County   Riverview Business Park  • Dairy Processing Company – Could produce high-energy waste for an anaerobic digester at Wastewater Treatment plant Aug 28.2011  Click here for Brochure 
 July 20 2011
   

Bion Request bid on Slaughter House


Dear Citizens and friends of the Town of Schroeppel and Village of Phoenix,

Thanks for all of the help and support you gave. We were able to keep mining from spoiling our town, and most importantly, our water supply. We need your help once again to pay the lawyer we hired to ensure our position if the vote had not gone in our favor. The bill came to just over $5000.00 and we are asking each family to make a $10.00 donation to the Pleasant Lake Association, who will be writing the final check. Of course, we will accept a donation of any size that you would like to make.

The fastest and easier way to make a donation is online through PayPal. Even if you don't have a PayPal account, you can still donate using a credit or debit card. Click the button below to donate online

   Yes I would Like to make a Donation to help Protect the Town of Schroeppel

:



Neighbors upset about proposed gravel mine operation in Schroeppel
by Jim Kenyon
Schroeppel to conduct public hearing Thursday on proposed gravel mine


                                      

Oswego County Officials eye Bion progress at Pa. site 4/19/2011
July 20 2011
Bion  request Bid for a   

Waste-cleaning technology getting test in Lancaster County

July 21, 2011|By Amy Worden, Inquirer Staff Writer   (New )
                         
                                             
Take the Kreider Farms Tour
                                                            Click Here

  
 On Monday (May 9, 2011)  a member of the CFA  & a Syracuse U student who is majoring in Film Documentary toured the Kreider Farm and the local area to find out how the Kreider Farm and the Bion project in Oswego County are a like.
                                     ( Film will be previewed in Aug) 
    The farm pictured below is the Kreider Farm that has the
Bio reactor on it ----
                                    The picture below was taken in 1992
                                      (No
Bio reactor was on it at that time )

                                                                 Information about the Farm
1. 1,200 dairy cows are in the Barn to the Top Left
2. Middle Barn is the Milking Barn -Cows are milked 3 times per day.
3. Next Barn is the Barn they use for sick cows
4. Ponds below the Barns are for the cows waste (3  ponds )
5. The 
Bio reactor now is located just below the Barns in the ponds area as  of
     (May 9, 2011)
6. The building to the lower far right are for 5 million chickens


Apr 19, 2011 at 1:44 pm   OswegoCountyToday.com
 
Bion Issues Progress Report On Kreider Waste Treatment Installation
Cause for Comment: Money talks
Posting Date: 04-20-2011-by Wes Belcher



Carbon Credits ?

 
 

A carbon credit is a generic term meaning that a value has been assigned to a reduction or offset of greenhouse gas emissions.[1] Carbon credits and markets are key components of national and international attempts to mitigate the growth in concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs). One carbon credit is equal to one ton of carbon dioxide, or in some markets, carbon dioxide equivalent gases. Carbon trading is an application of an emissions trading approach. Greenhouse gas emissions are capped and then markets are used to allocate the emissions among the group of regulated sources. The goal is to allow market mechanisms to drive industrial and commercial processes in the direction of low emissions or less carbon intensive approaches than those used when there is no cost to emitting carbon dioxide and other GHGs into the atmosphere. Since GHG mitigation projects generate credits, this approach can be used to finance carbon reduction schemes between trading partners and around the world.

There are also many companies that sell carbon credits to commercial and individual customers who are interested in lowering their carbon footprint on a voluntary basis. These carbon offsetters purchase the credits from an investment fund or a carbon development company that has aggregated the credits from individual projects. The quality of the credits is based in part on the validation process and sophistication of the fund or development company that acted as the sponsor to the carbon project. This is reflected in their price; voluntary units typically have less value than the units sold through the rigorously validated Clean Development Mechanism[2]
 

Burning of fossil fuels is a major source of industrial greenhouse gas emissions, especially for power, cement, steel, textile, fertilizer and many other industries which rely on fossil fuels (coal, electricity derived from coal, natural gas and oil). The major greenhouse gases emitted by these industries are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), etc, all of which increase the atmosphere's ability to trap infrared energy and thus affect the climate.

The concept of carbon credits came into existence as a result of increasing awareness of the need for controlling emissions. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has observed[3] that:

Policies that provide a real or implicit price of carbon could create incentives for producers and consumers to significantly invest in low-GHG products, technologies and processes. Such policies could include economic instruments, government funding and regulation,

while noting that a tradable permit system is one of the policy instruments that has been shown to be environmentally effective in the industrial sector, as long as there are reasonable levels of predictability over the initial allocation mechanism and long-term price.

The mechanism was formalized in the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement between more than 170 countries, and the market mechanisms were agreed through the subsequent Marrakesh Accords. The mechanism adopted was similar to the successful US Acid Rain Program to reduce some industrial pollutants.

 Emission allowances

Under the Kyoto Protocol, the 'caps' or quotas for Greenhouse gases for the developed Annex 1 countries are known as Assigned Amounts and are listed in Annex B.[4] The quantity of the initial assigned amount is denominated in individual units, called Assigned amount units (AAUs), each of which represents an allowance to emit one metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent, and these are entered into the country's national registry.[5]

In turn, these countries set quotas on the emissions of installations run by local business and other organizations, generically termed 'operators'. Countries manage this through their national registries, which are required to be validated and monitored for compliance by the UNFCCC.[6] Each operator has an allowance of credits, where each unit gives the owner the right to emit one metric tonne of carbon dioxide or other equivalent greenhouse gas. Operators that have not used up their quotas can sell their unused allowances as carbon credits, while businesses that are about to exceed their quotas can buy the extra allowances as credits, privately or on the open market. As demand for energy grows over time, the total emissions must still stay within the cap, but it allows industry some flexibility and predictability in its planning to accommodate this.

By permitting allowances to be bought and sold, an operator can seek out the most cost-effective way of reducing its emissions, either by investing in 'cleaner' machinery and practices or by purchasing emissions from another operator who already has excess 'capacity'.

Since 2005, the Kyoto mechanism has been adopted for CO2 trading by all the countries within the European Union under its European Trading Scheme (EU ETS) with the European Commission as its validating authority.[7] From 2008, EU participants must link with the other developed countries who ratified Annex I of the protocol, and trade the six most significant anthropogenic greenhouse gases. In the United States, which has not ratified Kyoto, and Australia, whose ratification came into force in March 2008, similar schemes are being considered.

 
 

Farmers Union’s Carbon Credit Program allows ag producers and landowners to earn income by storing carbon in their soil through no-till crop production, conversion of cropland to grass, sustainable management of native rangelands and tree plantings on previously non-forested or degraded land. In addition, the capture of methane from anaerobic manure digester systems can also earn carbon credits.

Farmers Union has earned approval from the Chicago Climate Exchange to aggregate carbon offsets (carbon credits) and sell them on behalf of producers. Farmers Union enrolls producer acreage into blocks of marketable offsets that are traded on the Exchange, much like other agricultural commodities are sold. Proceeds from the sales are then forwarded to producers as each pool of carbon credits is marketed. National Farmers Union’s Carbon Credit Program earned more than $8 million for producers in its first two year of operation.

No-till crop production offsets are eligible in most central and eastern states. Seeded grass acres can be enrolled in most states and managed native rangeland offsets are offered mostly in central and western states. Maps are available on this Web site that show eligible states and counties. They are automatically programmed into the enrollment system and payment estimator. Forestry and agricultural methane projects also are available in every state.

Farmers Union offers continuous online enrollments for all offset types, although pools of enrollments are closed periodically for verification and registration of offsets.  Producers provide land descriptions or map designations for the land they enroll in the program. The entered information is then transferred directly into Farmers Union’s database. Producers then follow up by sending in FSA 578 forms that detail their cropland acres, pasture descriptions, grazing plans for range acres and current maps. Producers also remit a signed contract. It is necessary for producers to have a valid e-mail address, as well as a post office address, for communication and verification purposes.

Agricultural methane offsets are also available, but only sample contracts and applications are available online. These individual projects will require producers or landowners to send in all materials by mail. Pooling, verification and marketing of carbon offsets will follow.

In step with the dramatic rise in C02 emissions and other pollutants in recent years, a variety of new financial markets have emerged, offering businesses key incentives — aside from taxes and other punitive measures — to slow down overall emissions growth and, ideally, global warming itself.

A key feature of these markets is emissions trading, or cap-and-trade schemes, which allow companies to buy or sell “credits” that collectively bind all participating companies to an overall emissions limit. While markets operate for specific pollutants such as greenhouse gases and acid rain, by far the biggest emissions market is for carbon. In 2007, the trade market for C02 credits hit $60 billion worldwide — almost double the amount from 2006.

Greenhouse Gas – Carbon Credits

Like the CAA, the Kyoto Treaty has a provision for the earning and trading of carbon dioxide emission reduction credits – carbon credits. In anticipation of its ratification, carbon credits have been trading for several years.

In January 2005 the European Union carbon credit trading program commenced, The market for these credits has been predicted to grow to $40 to $100 billion per year. Europe is already not meeting its commitments for Greenhouse Gas reductions and, as a result, the prices of Carbon Credits has gone up (to $28 per tonne as of Oct 5, 2005). With the known reductions of methane and NOx for the Bion process, the Bion process offsets the equivalent of 9.3 tonnes of Greenhouse

Warming Gases per cow per year. At current levels, this is the equivalent of $260 of carbon credits per cow per year.

AgCert, a privately owned company, has been awarded an approved protocol for taking animal manure, placing it a lined hole in the ground, flaring the methane gas which results, and earning tradable carbon credits. Bion believes that CAFO operations utilizing its technology in Kyoto signatory countries (including Canada) will be able to qualify for such credits. Bion is in the early stages of evaluating the business opportunities this potentially creates for the Company
 
 

Carbon credit

Update April 14 2010
This article deals with carbon credits for international trading. For carbon credits for individuals, see personal carbon trading. For voluntary schemes see also carbon offset
A Carbon credit is a generic term meaning that a value has been assigned to a reduction or offset of greenhouse gas emissions.[1] Carbon credits and markets are key components of national and international attempts to mitigate the growth in concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs). One carbon credit is equal to one ton of carbon dioxide, or in some markets, carbon dioxide equivalent gases. Carbon trading is an application of an emissions trading approach. Greenhouse gas emissions are capped and then markets are used to allocate the emissions among the group of regulated sources. The goal is to allow market mechanisms to drive industrial and commercial processes in the direction of low emissions or less carbon intensive approaches than those used when there is no cost to emitting carbon dioxide and other GHGs into the atmosphere. Since GHG mitigation projects generate credits, this approach can be used to finance carbon reduction schemes between trading partners and around the world.
There are also many companies that sell carbon credits to commercial and individual customers who are interested in lowering their carbon footprint on a voluntary basis. These carbon offsetters purchase the credits from an investment fund or a carbon development company that has aggregated the credits from individual projects. The quality of the credits is based in part on the validation process and sophistication of the fund or development company that acted as the sponsor to the carbon project. This is reflected in their price; voluntary units typically have less value than the units sold through the rigorously-validated Clean Development Mechanism[2].
___________________________________
Carbon Market Potential
According to a recent New York Times article, carbon trading is one of the "fastest-growing specialties in financial services." And companies are scrambling to get a slice of a market now worth well over 100 billion and that could grow to $1 trillion within a decade.
The article, "In London's Financial World, Carbon Trading Is the New Big Thing," goes on: "Carbon will be the world's biggest commodity market, and it could become the world's biggest market over all."
If you doubt that assertion, consider this: Every year, humans generate about 38 billion tons of carbon dioxide.
And that number will continue to grow, as developing nations demand more energy that will likely be produced by coal and other carbon heavy sources of fuel.
As more international governments start to regulate their country's emissions, and as more companies start to voluntarily limit their emissions (as we're seeing in the U.S.), the demand for available carbon credits will skyrocket. And so will their price!
One need only revert to the simple law of supply and demand to see that this industry is going to be huge. If increased demand dictates an increase in price, getting in now could be one of the wisest investment moves you make in the first half of this century
_______________________

Carbon Trading: The World's Next Biggest Market


For example, a company that produces electricity via a clean renewable resource may not only sell the electricity, but also the carbon credits earned from not burning fossil fuels. . . so long as the emission reductions are certified by an independent third party

Of course, this arrangement would be much easier to understand and keep track of if a cap and trade system were implemented by the federal government. In fact, just capping the amount of emissions would do wonders.
Today, only 3% of our electricity is renewably produced. A 12% increase in the next twelve years would not only send renewables through the roof, but would create a pretty sweet carbon market as well.
As the demand increases for carbon credits, many companies are coming on the scene that specialize in reducing emissions. These are companies that help reduce the overall emissions of a variety of businesses, like farms, factories, and utilities.
These companies are not only getting premium consulting fees, but a portion of the carbon credit proceeds, as well.

Bion Technical Summary Performance Report: Implications for Public Policy


Bion Dairy has recently published the results of a seven-month performance evaluation of its full-scale CAFO waste treatment installation at the 1,250-cow DeVries Dairy (DVD) in Dublin Texas..
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Web Hosting Companies